Posted by Palk
Tuesday, November 27, 2007, 11:14pm
I am happy to be here now, after visiting off on and on for 30 years. But I sense the homogenization referenced by so many in these comments. Mass developments, large-scene plans seem inappropriate to foster what grows from the actions of individuals, from communities, from people. Those giant social projects, developed by corporate interests don't seem to reach our hearts and souls. How can they? Real, use human communities need protection from those forces, need to the ability to cause them to atomize.
So what is the effect of the weak dollar? How has that influenced the direction the city is going? Is it altering the course?
Posted by Yoichiro Yoda
Monday, October 29, 2007, 12:59pm
No it is definitely not. we are losing our historic buildings, theatres hotels at an alarming rate. Greedy developers are getting their way, and the cost is outrageous.
Just look at what's become of Times Square, Coney Island, The Playpen theatre, and the beloved Hotel Pennsylvania. So much is being sacrificed in the name of "Progress" today that if this keeps up, we will have very little to present to the rest of the world and for future generations to enjoy and take pride in. Greed is destroying our city. We must preserve, not destroy. There is always an alternative to tearing something down. If this keeps up, NYC will become a sea of boring office towers, luxury hotels, and chain stores.
Posted by John Morris
Saturday, October 6, 2007, 06:24pm
Yes, The city must change and i finally is. It seems like the bulk of people on here are complaining about affordability while at the same time compaining about all the new construction. If this construction had happened a long time ago things would have been better.
The extreme demand for Manhattan High rises reflects the fact that only Manhattan and a few parts of Queens and Brooklyn, like LIC, Downtown Brooklyn etc,, have decent enough transit infrastructure to support a lot of density so everyone who wants a high level of convenience has to stuff themselves into Manhattan.
If the money and energy that went into building the infrasructure of sprawl for Long Island, Jersey and Westchester had been invested in NY, things would have been better. If the zoning laws had been killed, 30 years ago, or even better if rent control had been killed we would have had profits in the lower end rental market.
The other big factor here is that NY, is one of only about 5 decently walkable and dense cities in the entire country and the demand for this kind of life far exceeds the allowed supply.
Basically, we are seeing just how bad most of our previous mayors and policies have been.
Posted by Visitor
Friday, October 5, 2007, 09:32pm
yes!!!!
the city is in really good hands. i don;'t even know why you would ask such a question. do you know frank? well, you should. he will keep us safe.
Posted by Visitorbeth young
Thursday, October 4, 2007, 03:10pm
No... The city is dying... all the communities that were so vivid no longer exist... gentrification, the mallization of the city, corporate schools, i.e. Columbia University, N.Y.U. are buying up real estate kicking out communities , selling out, and off our community gardens. The rents are ridiculous and Mayor Bloomberg's "affordable housing" project is a very skinny bone thrown to what ? o.o1 percent of an already overwhelmed lower/working class. move to the boroughs, and see how long the immigrant communities will last.
Posted by Maickel Clemente
Wednesday, October 3, 2007, 07:04pm
What is really a shame is the lost of affordable housing. The city is becoming more and more expensive and it seems like it is only designed for the rich people, which are fewer and fewer as we, the middle class, and poor are growing and grwoing in numbers. Moreover, the feeling that Manhattan is unconnected to everything else is getting more evident and seems like a flag for politicians: keep everyone else away from it, and let just the economically wealthy in it.
New York, a city known for receiving immigrants from at least 173 countries in the world, is now acting in an segregating manner. Charge people from the north of 86st for going downtown? people coming from the Bronx, Brooklyn and Queens to be charged as well? Not to mention the million of people that come to work from NJ, since being pushed out from the city! Is the separation of the impossibly expensive Manhattan the way to go? Since when Americans, and particularly New Yorkers have become so mean and nasty towards other communities?
My ex-boss - a wealthy Colombian immigrant who now owns real state in Chelsea and Soho- told me about the congestion charge that "it was great! keep everyone else out! the city is ours!" Seems to be the message Bloomberg tries to convey with his mangament.
Posted by Betsy Haggerty
Wednesday, October 3, 2007, 05:53pm
Alas, no! Manhattan, especially the Upper West Side, where I live and have lived for 40 years, has become gentrified, high-rised and homogonized, to the extent that the vibrant mix and lively streets that drew me there have become filled with Duane Reades, banks and upscale restaurants. I mourn the loss of independent bookstores, family-run groceries and shops and fact that the middle class is being pushed out. In February, my unregulated rent will go up 40 percent. I will have to move, and I don't know where. I'd hate to leave the West Side but I may have to.
Posted by Betsy Haggerty
Wednesday, October 3, 2007, 05:52pm
Alas, no! Manhattan, especially the Upper West Side, where I live and have lived for 40 years, has become gentrified, high-rised and homogonized, to the extent that the vibrant mix and lively streets that drew me there have become filled with Duane Reades, banks and upscale restaurants. I mourn the loss of independent bookstores, family-run groceries and shops and fact that the middle class is being pushed out. In February, my unregulated rent will go up 40 percent. I will have to move, and I don't know where. I'd hate to leave the West Side but I may have to.
Posted by Betsy Haggerty
Wednesday, October 3, 2007, 05:52pm
Alas, no! Manhattan, especially the Upper West Side, where I live and have lived for 40 years, has become gentrified, high-rised and homogonized, to the extent that the vibrant mix and lively streets that drew me there have become filled with Duane Reades, banks and upscale restaurants. I mourn the loss of independent bookstores, family-run groceries and shops and fact that the middle class is being pushed out. In February, my unregulated rent will go up 40 percent. I will have to move, and I don't know where. I'd hate to leave the West Side but I may have to.
Posted by Visitor
Wednesday, October 3, 2007, 05:39pm
No. I wonder how many new bank openings will it take for my neighborhood (UWS) to reach sterility. Looking at new residential developments, how many of them have retail (when zoning permmits) at their base? And will most of these new buildings be filled with foreign, absentee residents (due to the weak dollar), and what would that mean?
No. Not when the real estate interests are the equivalent of public policy. It's said that our mayor and his sidekick Doctoroff have never see a RE development they don't like, but it seems at times also that they never see a manufacturing job or small-business owner they like. Does all that have to be the only solution for balancing the budget and for NYC'S future?
I work on 6th Ave. in the 50s. Thank goodness for Rock. Ctr. Plaza and 9th Avenue.
And for the few side streets bet. 5th and 6th aves. left with urban life left in them = 55th, 56th, and 58th sts. But that is changing. MOMA has destroyed what was left of 54th St. Yes, that area has been changing for decades, but is their some point when we should wonder about the quality of life for those working, living, and visiting the area? Wouldn't that be good econimic sense? Isn't all that I am writing really basic?! [BTW, all my artist friends HATE MOMA. They are not interested (excepting cineastes) and despise the new building. MOMA is a nice thing for tourists. With the clout to do whatever they want to their neighborhood. If one of our supposedly main cultural institutions is so completely detached from the city and design aestherics (!), well, what then?
Posted by Michael D'Alto
Wednesday, October 3, 2007, 09:35am
The recent developments in this city are positive, but whether the overall direction is correct will depend on each of us steering the energy and developmental capacity of the city forward on all fronts...the economic development should be balanced with investment in community structures, social and cultural organizations, and a sensitivity to the elements of society that make this city great.
Posted by B arbara Presar
Wednesday, October 3, 2007, 08:16am
With the proliferation of all these new hi-rises (how many do we really need?) I think there should be a fair amount set aside offered to members of NYC police and fire departments at affordable prices.
Posted by Allison
Tuesday, October 2, 2007, 10:38pm
Depends on the topic:
Housing - absolutely not; there is such limited affordable housing for the middle class
Transportation - it has been slow going, but they are definitely moving in the right direction - discussing congestion charging, adding more bike lanes (although secure bike parking would be a nice addition). I do wish they'd talk more about parking management, reducing government placards, and charging for what on-street parking is really worth.
Posted by Visitor Janet Spittler
Tuesday, October 2, 2007, 09:38pm
I feel there needs to be more of a community for all artists and not just granting the Latinos, Chinese and brown people all the grants and opportunities for showing their work as new artists. I feel as if I need to change my name to something Latin to get any acknowledgement for showing my work as a new emerging artist. Is there a Swiss American ARt or Curtural club? I feel there needs to be more art taught in the schools both in and after school programs so creativity is not lost in human life.
Posted by Visitor
Tuesday, October 2, 2007, 08:21pm
I live in Washinton Hieghts. When ever I walk past a store front construction site, I hope something interesting will open. Bank of America, no interest. Latin wine bar with live Jazz, interesting. Chain Indian take out, disapointing.
Posted by El Pibe
Tuesday, October 2, 2007, 04:34pm
yes, there's no crime these days. it's crazy that people complain about the city today when its safer, cleaner, there are more jobs and the population is rising. if people didn't want to live here, they wouldn't be coming no more.
Posted by Alondra Marte
Tuesday, October 2, 2007, 02:51pm
I belive the city is infact moving in the right direction. People have started to actknowledge our problem with pollution, population, and politics. I believe that regarding architecture, the city is moving in the right direction since architecture students are being introduced to the problems our society is facing before we develope a certain style of design. We will face the problems and resolve them during our life time.
Posted by Robert Sawyer
Saturday, September 29, 2007, 10:46pm
New York has always been an unfaithful lover. She expects your adoration and your money; but will betray you all the same. The moment you suspect her affection is drifting; you might as well pack your bags because you've been replaced. Then, the choice is yours: Slink into nostalgia, grow sad or cynical or move to more hospitable climes.
Posted by john morris
Saturday, September 29, 2007, 10:33am
I now live in Pittsburgh, basically for financial reasons. As I go back to New York, in general I see acity that is becoming more walkable, less car oriented, safer and more finacially sustainable than before.
The big problem, that i see for the city is that the changes happening now in terms of openig up construction on the waterfronts, deregulating zoning laws and investing in mass transit should have happened about 30 yeras ago. What we have now is a situation in which only Manhattan and a few areas of waterfront Brooklyn and Queens have enough mass transit to fully support mixed use dense neighborhoods. This general shortage of supply of housing, and a lack of a viable transit grid in the outer boroughs makes it hard to develop them. Added to that is rent control and other policies that remove profits from lower and middle class housing.
The city is trying to wake up from the long nighmare of that started in the 40's with Robert moses's attempts to destroy the city.
Posted by Timmy Coleman
Saturday, September 29, 2007, 02:54am
I struggle with this question most days. New York has always been in a state of flux. Change is part of the magic. However, I feel like New York is indeed, tipping in the wrong direction. All the big chains stores that you can find in any city anywhere, has stipped Manhattan of it's uniqueness. The preliforation (sp) of glass condos going from tip to tip of the island is homogeneous. However, all one need do, is see the thriving life of the green market at Union Square or the beauty of the new Robert Stern apartment at 15 Central Park West or take a stroll through the park, to be reminded that the dance of the magnificent urban ballet continues...
Posted by Anonymous
Friday, September 28, 2007, 09:07pm
Carnegie Hall Corporation which has leased the Hall and the adjoining studios from the City of New York is in the process of evicting the remaining artists who still live and work there in order to gut the interior of this historic building. The current board of Carnegie Hall led by Sanford Weill and his Wall Street cronies has not made clear why this needs to be done. Luxury condos?
Should you wish to have more information about yet another attempt to destroy the soul of New York go to www.studiotowerartists.com.
With enough support from taxpayers, perhaps this outrageous act can be stopped.
Posted by Frank&Earnest
Friday, September 28, 2007, 05:43pm
I feel like Lou Dobbs here but the middle classes are getting squeezed majorly right now and it looks like it's going to continue because the only equity Bloomberg's interested in is a financial product and not a social one.
where oh where is the city government mandated affordable housing for key workers - like nurses, firefighters, teachers and police?
if these people can't afford to live here, and start leaving, that might wake-up city government.
Posted by Reyna Alorro
Thursday, September 27, 2007, 04:14pm
I'm not sure as I'm new here. But I do know how tough it is to find an affordable place to live here. As an urban planner, I understand that gentrification is often a reality. But through inclusionary housing policies and by supporting small businesses as well as letting some big businesses come in, the city can progress.
Posted by Shannon
Thursday, September 27, 2007, 12:46pm
NY is risking its creative culture for the sake of gross capitalism, selling its soul to developer after developer. Meanwhile, a flight of the creative class is occurring. Who can afford to not just live here barely scraping by, but thrive? Mega-developments loom large, hovering quite literally over my rent-controlled Brooklyn apartment, I await the day when my landlord cannot afford to not sell my building.
Posted by Matthew Hickey
Thursday, September 27, 2007, 05:56am
Sadly no. The city has gone too far. Independent businesses cannot survive. Times Square has become a homogenized open air mall for the wealthy and for tourists. Far too many businesses that should've been considered landmarks have closed their doors unable to survive. The consequence is where there was one one bank every few blocks, now there is seemingly 3 banks on every corner, as banks are the only ones who can afford the rent. As a lifelong new yorker I cannot help but feel that the city has lost much of it's soul, as well as at least one of it's two balls. What was once a teeming hotbed of art, music, danger, excitement and unpredictability and unimaginable economic and cultural diversity now resembles a millionaires island of chain stores, banks, absurd cabaret laws and smoking bans.
Posted by A Tree Grows in Brooklyn
Wednesday, September 26, 2007, 09:52pm
In a word: no. Why?: chain store mallification...developers without vision, backing suburbanization (in pursuit of a quick buck), starchitects, capable of beauty, blinded by vertical sun-blocking aggrandizement of their egos (over what is appropriate for a neighborhood...did you hear me? n e i g h b o r h o o d). Development means to restore/respect the old, the "what came before" & build upon the concept...not level the history with this shortsighted "slash and burn" mentality. How many luxury hi-rise condos do we really need in this city? Will the first floors be filled with generic chain stores found everywhere else in this country? Will there be a middle class in the future...or any small business owners? Sure, continue to raise the subway fares, while offering (taxpayer) subsidies in the millions (!) to your so-called developers, who are going to turn around & sell it all for a sizable gain... Open your eyes. New York has been great because of the history, the distinctive flavor of all of it's citizens and neighborhoods - don't turn it into a giant strip mall surrounded by luxury condos.
Posted by Cathy
Wednesday, September 26, 2007, 07:05pm
I'm sad to see the corridor along First Avenue choked with truck traffic, noise levels increasing, becoming less live-able while developers like Sheldon Solow and Harry Macklowe continue to increase density without thought. The Sutton area used to be an area with a variety of incomes (surprisingly) due to the apts over stores in low rise buildings at one end of the spectrum and elegant townhouses on Sutton Place. We had every kind of store you could need within two blocks along with restaurants that had been in place for many, many years with a faithful customer base. Now we have glass-cube condos and Duane Reade stores one after another. This is urban blight.
Posted by Visitor
Wednesday, September 26, 2007, 06:36pm
No, not when every crane on the horizon represents something I, a middle-income resident, can't possibly afford (& quality I wouldn't shell out for if I could! ). This town is the new & skewed epicenter of the "luxury market" & there is no longer any room for the middle class here.
New Miami. Unsustainably top-heavy.
Posted by Visitoraudrey leshin
Wednesday, September 26, 2007, 02:33pm
The city is moving in the wrong direction. This is an era of the bankification, Duane Readeification, Starbuck'sification, etc. of the city. The traffic is choking and polluting
the life out of the city. The State Assembly and Senate are engaging in petty, tin horn
politics in delaying the Mayor's Congestion Pricing Plan. They are party hacks and
only interested in their own agenda - to get elected. The public and the pedestrian
be damned. Byciclists ride through the streets unmindful of traffic lights, rules,
and direction. Especially the delivery men. No traffic policemen are around to
enforce the rules - re gridblock and other violations. New York is a city of the
lawless.! Yesterday was the time for Action - today is too late.
Posted by visitor
Wednesday, September 26, 2007, 12:16pm
It's fragmented -- some areas are, and some aren't -- and it feels like the ones that aren't are moving in a significantly negative (and unchangeable) direction . And they're getting that way quickly.
Comments
(Post new comment)I am happy to be here now,
Posted by PalkTuesday, November 27, 2007, 11:14pm
I am happy to be here now, after visiting off on and on for 30 years. But I sense the homogenization referenced by so many in these comments. Mass developments, large-scene plans seem inappropriate to foster what grows from the actions of individuals, from communities, from people. Those giant social projects, developed by corporate interests don't seem to reach our hearts and souls. How can they? Real, use human communities need protection from those forces, need to the ability to cause them to atomize.
So what is the effect of the weak dollar? How has that influenced the direction the city is going? Is it altering the course?
No it is definitely not. we
Posted by Yoichiro YodaMonday, October 29, 2007, 12:59pm
No it is definitely not. we are losing our historic buildings, theatres hotels at an alarming rate. Greedy developers are getting their way, and the cost is outrageous.
Just look at what's become of Times Square, Coney Island, The Playpen theatre, and the beloved Hotel Pennsylvania. So much is being sacrificed in the name of "Progress" today that if this keeps up, we will have very little to present to the rest of the world and for future generations to enjoy and take pride in. Greed is destroying our city. We must preserve, not destroy. There is always an alternative to tearing something down. If this keeps up, NYC will become a sea of boring office towers, luxury hotels, and chain stores.
Yes, The city must change
Posted by John MorrisSaturday, October 6, 2007, 06:24pm
Yes, The city must change and i finally is. It seems like the bulk of people on here are complaining about affordability while at the same time compaining about all the new construction. If this construction had happened a long time ago things would have been better.
The extreme demand for Manhattan High rises reflects the fact that only Manhattan and a few parts of Queens and Brooklyn, like LIC, Downtown Brooklyn etc,, have decent enough transit infrastructure to support a lot of density so everyone who wants a high level of convenience has to stuff themselves into Manhattan.
If the money and energy that went into building the infrasructure of sprawl for Long Island, Jersey and Westchester had been invested in NY, things would have been better. If the zoning laws had been killed, 30 years ago, or even better if rent control had been killed we would have had profits in the lower end rental market.
The other big factor here is that NY, is one of only about 5 decently walkable and dense cities in the entire country and the demand for this kind of life far exceeds the allowed supply.
Basically, we are seeing just how bad most of our previous mayors and policies have been.
yes!!!! the city is in
Posted by VisitorFriday, October 5, 2007, 09:32pm
yes!!!!
the city is in really good hands. i don;'t even know why you would ask such a question. do you know frank? well, you should. he will keep us safe.
No... The city is dying...
Posted by Visitorbeth youngThursday, October 4, 2007, 03:10pm
No... The city is dying... all the communities that were so vivid no longer exist... gentrification, the mallization of the city, corporate schools, i.e. Columbia University, N.Y.U. are buying up real estate kicking out communities , selling out, and off our community gardens. The rents are ridiculous and Mayor Bloomberg's "affordable housing" project is a very skinny bone thrown to what ? o.o1 percent of an already overwhelmed lower/working class. move to the boroughs, and see how long the immigrant communities will last.
No
Posted by VisitorThursday, October 4, 2007, 03:02pm
No
yes
Posted by VisitorThursday, October 4, 2007, 10:03am
yes
The only question worth
Posted by AdamThursday, October 4, 2007, 12:31am
The only question worth asking is "am I moving in the right direction?" Change yourself, change the world.
In some ways yes and in some
Posted by VisitorWednesday, October 3, 2007, 08:40pm
In some ways yes and in some ways no. I need to learn more before I fully judge.
Not really.
Posted by Maickel ClementeWednesday, October 3, 2007, 07:04pm
What is really a shame is the lost of affordable housing. The city is becoming more and more expensive and it seems like it is only designed for the rich people, which are fewer and fewer as we, the middle class, and poor are growing and grwoing in numbers. Moreover, the feeling that Manhattan is unconnected to everything else is getting more evident and seems like a flag for politicians: keep everyone else away from it, and let just the economically wealthy in it.
New York, a city known for receiving immigrants from at least 173 countries in the world, is now acting in an segregating manner. Charge people from the north of 86st for going downtown? people coming from the Bronx, Brooklyn and Queens to be charged as well? Not to mention the million of people that come to work from NJ, since being pushed out from the city! Is the separation of the impossibly expensive Manhattan the way to go? Since when Americans, and particularly New Yorkers have become so mean and nasty towards other communities?
My ex-boss - a wealthy Colombian immigrant who now owns real state in Chelsea and Soho- told me about the congestion charge that "it was great! keep everyone else out! the city is ours!" Seems to be the message Bloomberg tries to convey with his mangament.
Alas, no! Manhattan,
Posted by Betsy HaggertyWednesday, October 3, 2007, 05:53pm
Alas, no! Manhattan, especially the Upper West Side, where I live and have lived for 40 years, has become gentrified, high-rised and homogonized, to the extent that the vibrant mix and lively streets that drew me there have become filled with Duane Reades, banks and upscale restaurants. I mourn the loss of independent bookstores, family-run groceries and shops and fact that the middle class is being pushed out. In February, my unregulated rent will go up 40 percent. I will have to move, and I don't know where. I'd hate to leave the West Side but I may have to.
Alas, no! Manhattan,
Posted by Betsy HaggertyWednesday, October 3, 2007, 05:52pm
Alas, no! Manhattan, especially the Upper West Side, where I live and have lived for 40 years, has become gentrified, high-rised and homogonized, to the extent that the vibrant mix and lively streets that drew me there have become filled with Duane Reades, banks and upscale restaurants. I mourn the loss of independent bookstores, family-run groceries and shops and fact that the middle class is being pushed out. In February, my unregulated rent will go up 40 percent. I will have to move, and I don't know where. I'd hate to leave the West Side but I may have to.
Alas, no! Manhattan,
Posted by Betsy HaggertyWednesday, October 3, 2007, 05:52pm
Alas, no! Manhattan, especially the Upper West Side, where I live and have lived for 40 years, has become gentrified, high-rised and homogonized, to the extent that the vibrant mix and lively streets that drew me there have become filled with Duane Reades, banks and upscale restaurants. I mourn the loss of independent bookstores, family-run groceries and shops and fact that the middle class is being pushed out. In February, my unregulated rent will go up 40 percent. I will have to move, and I don't know where. I'd hate to leave the West Side but I may have to.
No. I wonder how many new
Posted by VisitorWednesday, October 3, 2007, 05:39pm
No. I wonder how many new bank openings will it take for my neighborhood (UWS) to reach sterility. Looking at new residential developments, how many of them have retail (when zoning permmits) at their base? And will most of these new buildings be filled with foreign, absentee residents (due to the weak dollar), and what would that mean?
No. Not when the real estate interests are the equivalent of public policy. It's said that our mayor and his sidekick Doctoroff have never see a RE development they don't like, but it seems at times also that they never see a manufacturing job or small-business owner they like. Does all that have to be the only solution for balancing the budget and for NYC'S future?
I work on 6th Ave. in the 50s. Thank goodness for Rock. Ctr. Plaza and 9th Avenue.
And for the few side streets bet. 5th and 6th aves. left with urban life left in them = 55th, 56th, and 58th sts. But that is changing. MOMA has destroyed what was left of 54th St. Yes, that area has been changing for decades, but is their some point when we should wonder about the quality of life for those working, living, and visiting the area? Wouldn't that be good econimic sense? Isn't all that I am writing really basic?! [BTW, all my artist friends HATE MOMA. They are not interested (excepting cineastes) and despise the new building. MOMA is a nice thing for tourists. With the clout to do whatever they want to their neighborhood. If one of our supposedly main cultural institutions is so completely detached from the city and design aestherics (!), well, what then?
Depends...
Posted by Jack JacobsWednesday, October 3, 2007, 02:25pm
Depends...
I'd like to speak to someone
Posted by VisitorWednesday, October 3, 2007, 01:51pm
I'd like to speak to someone about an ongoing project that would change NYC reuse of office equipment which currently goes on with no accountability.
Please e-mail info@mas.org
Posted by MAS AdminWednesday, October 3, 2007, 04:25pm
Please e-mail info@mas.org with your contact details and an MAS staffer will get back to you.
not quite. it's clearly
Posted by bobWednesday, October 3, 2007, 12:17pm
not quite. it's clearly losing its soul, and the art is moving to outer boroughs.
the greenspaces are nice, though.
and the safety and lack of crack is nice.
we still haven't quite undone moses's blight.
The recent developments in
Posted by Michael D'AltoWednesday, October 3, 2007, 09:35am
The recent developments in this city are positive, but whether the overall direction is correct will depend on each of us steering the energy and developmental capacity of the city forward on all fronts...the economic development should be balanced with investment in community structures, social and cultural organizations, and a sensitivity to the elements of society that make this city great.
With the proliferation of
Posted by B arbara PresarWednesday, October 3, 2007, 08:16am
With the proliferation of all these new hi-rises (how many do we really need?) I think there should be a fair amount set aside offered to members of NYC police and fire departments at affordable prices.
Depends on the
Posted by AllisonTuesday, October 2, 2007, 10:38pm
Depends on the topic:
Housing - absolutely not; there is such limited affordable housing for the middle class
Transportation - it has been slow going, but they are definitely moving in the right direction - discussing congestion charging, adding more bike lanes (although secure bike parking would be a nice addition). I do wish they'd talk more about parking management, reducing government placards, and charging for what on-street parking is really worth.
I feel there needs to be
Posted by Visitor Janet SpittlerTuesday, October 2, 2007, 09:38pm
I feel there needs to be more of a community for all artists and not just granting the Latinos, Chinese and brown people all the grants and opportunities for showing their work as new artists. I feel as if I need to change my name to something Latin to get any acknowledgement for showing my work as a new emerging artist. Is there a Swiss American ARt or Curtural club? I feel there needs to be more art taught in the schools both in and after school programs so creativity is not lost in human life.
I live in Washinton Hieghts.
Posted by VisitorTuesday, October 2, 2007, 08:21pm
I live in Washinton Hieghts. When ever I walk past a store front construction site, I hope something interesting will open. Bank of America, no interest. Latin wine bar with live Jazz, interesting. Chain Indian take out, disapointing.
yes, there's no crime these
Posted by El PibeTuesday, October 2, 2007, 04:34pm
yes, there's no crime these days. it's crazy that people complain about the city today when its safer, cleaner, there are more jobs and the population is rising. if people didn't want to live here, they wouldn't be coming no more.
I belive the city is infact
Posted by Alondra MarteTuesday, October 2, 2007, 02:51pm
I belive the city is infact moving in the right direction. People have started to actknowledge our problem with pollution, population, and politics. I believe that regarding architecture, the city is moving in the right direction since architecture students are being introduced to the problems our society is facing before we develope a certain style of design. We will face the problems and resolve them during our life time.
yes...
Posted by VisitorMonday, October 1, 2007, 05:12pm
yes...
Depending how you look at
Posted by SyreetaMonday, October 1, 2007, 01:23pm
Depending how you look at it. It coule always be better in reference to satifiying the needs of the people.
s the city moving in the right direction?
Posted by Robert SawyerSaturday, September 29, 2007, 10:46pm
New York has always been an unfaithful lover. She expects your adoration and your money; but will betray you all the same. The moment you suspect her affection is drifting; you might as well pack your bags because you've been replaced. Then, the choice is yours: Slink into nostalgia, grow sad or cynical or move to more hospitable climes.
i'm not sure... do you know?
Posted by alli metallSaturday, September 29, 2007, 01:30pm
i'm not sure... do you know?
No.
Posted by Katherine SorelSaturday, September 29, 2007, 11:28am
No.
yes, it's the right direction but it might be too late
Posted by john morrisSaturday, September 29, 2007, 10:33am
I now live in Pittsburgh, basically for financial reasons. As I go back to New York, in general I see acity that is becoming more walkable, less car oriented, safer and more finacially sustainable than before.
The big problem, that i see for the city is that the changes happening now in terms of openig up construction on the waterfronts, deregulating zoning laws and investing in mass transit should have happened about 30 yeras ago. What we have now is a situation in which only Manhattan and a few areas of waterfront Brooklyn and Queens have enough mass transit to fully support mixed use dense neighborhoods. This general shortage of supply of housing, and a lack of a viable transit grid in the outer boroughs makes it hard to develop them. Added to that is rent control and other policies that remove profits from lower and middle class housing.
The city is trying to wake up from the long nighmare of that started in the 40's with Robert moses's attempts to destroy the city.
I struggle with this
Posted by Timmy ColemanSaturday, September 29, 2007, 02:54am
I struggle with this question most days. New York has always been in a state of flux. Change is part of the magic. However, I feel like New York is indeed, tipping in the wrong direction. All the big chains stores that you can find in any city anywhere, has stipped Manhattan of it's uniqueness. The preliforation (sp) of glass condos going from tip to tip of the island is homogeneous. However, all one need do, is see the thriving life of the green market at Union Square or the beauty of the new Robert Stern apartment at 15 Central Park West or take a stroll through the park, to be reminded that the dance of the magnificent urban ballet continues...
The Destruction of the Carnegie Hall Studios
Posted by AnonymousFriday, September 28, 2007, 09:07pm
Carnegie Hall Corporation which has leased the Hall and the adjoining studios from the City of New York is in the process of evicting the remaining artists who still live and work there in order to gut the interior of this historic building. The current board of Carnegie Hall led by Sanford Weill and his Wall Street cronies has not made clear why this needs to be done. Luxury condos?
Should you wish to have more information about yet another attempt to destroy the soul of New York go to www.studiotowerartists.com.
With enough support from taxpayers, perhaps this outrageous act can be stopped.
I feel like Lou Dobbs here
Posted by Frank&EarnestFriday, September 28, 2007, 05:43pm
I feel like Lou Dobbs here but the middle classes are getting squeezed majorly right now and it looks like it's going to continue because the only equity Bloomberg's interested in is a financial product and not a social one.
where oh where is the city government mandated affordable housing for key workers - like nurses, firefighters, teachers and police?
if these people can't afford to live here, and start leaving, that might wake-up city government.
It still exists.
Posted by Zane KirbyThursday, September 27, 2007, 05:51pm
It still exists.
Nope.
Posted by VisitorThursday, September 27, 2007, 04:41pm
Nope.
I'm not sure as I'm new
Posted by Reyna AlorroThursday, September 27, 2007, 04:14pm
I'm not sure as I'm new here. But I do know how tough it is to find an affordable place to live here. As an urban planner, I understand that gentrification is often a reality. But through inclusionary housing policies and by supporting small businesses as well as letting some big businesses come in, the city can progress.
NY is risking its creative
Posted by ShannonThursday, September 27, 2007, 12:46pm
NY is risking its creative culture for the sake of gross capitalism, selling its soul to developer after developer. Meanwhile, a flight of the creative class is occurring. Who can afford to not just live here barely scraping by, but thrive? Mega-developments loom large, hovering quite literally over my rent-controlled Brooklyn apartment, I await the day when my landlord cannot afford to not sell my building.
good luck with that....
Posted by VisitorThursday, September 27, 2007, 07:36am
good luck with that....
Sadly no. The city has gone
Posted by Matthew HickeyThursday, September 27, 2007, 05:56am
Sadly no. The city has gone too far. Independent businesses cannot survive. Times Square has become a homogenized open air mall for the wealthy and for tourists. Far too many businesses that should've been considered landmarks have closed their doors unable to survive. The consequence is where there was one one bank every few blocks, now there is seemingly 3 banks on every corner, as banks are the only ones who can afford the rent. As a lifelong new yorker I cannot help but feel that the city has lost much of it's soul, as well as at least one of it's two balls. What was once a teeming hotbed of art, music, danger, excitement and unpredictability and unimaginable economic and cultural diversity now resembles a millionaires island of chain stores, banks, absurd cabaret laws and smoking bans.
Maybe
Posted by JoeThursday, September 27, 2007, 12:50am
Maybe
where am i
Posted by VisitorWednesday, September 26, 2007, 11:58pm
where am i
"if it's yellow, let it
Posted by tommyWednesday, September 26, 2007, 11:32pm
"if it's yellow, let it mellow. if it's brown, flush it down"
-- Ed Koch
repeal all smoking bans. we
Posted by brandzWednesday, September 26, 2007, 10:38pm
repeal all smoking bans. we lose character with across-the-board smoking bans.
In a word: no. Why?: chain
Posted by A Tree Grows in BrooklynWednesday, September 26, 2007, 09:52pm
In a word: no. Why?: chain store mallification...developers without vision, backing suburbanization (in pursuit of a quick buck), starchitects, capable of beauty, blinded by vertical sun-blocking aggrandizement of their egos (over what is appropriate for a neighborhood...did you hear me? n e i g h b o r h o o d). Development means to restore/respect the old, the "what came before" & build upon the concept...not level the history with this shortsighted "slash and burn" mentality. How many luxury hi-rise condos do we really need in this city? Will the first floors be filled with generic chain stores found everywhere else in this country? Will there be a middle class in the future...or any small business owners? Sure, continue to raise the subway fares, while offering (taxpayer) subsidies in the millions (!) to your so-called developers, who are going to turn around & sell it all for a sizable gain... Open your eyes. New York has been great because of the history, the distinctive flavor of all of it's citizens and neighborhoods - don't turn it into a giant strip mall surrounded by luxury condos.
Midtown East
Posted by CathyWednesday, September 26, 2007, 07:05pm
I'm sad to see the corridor along First Avenue choked with truck traffic, noise levels increasing, becoming less live-able while developers like Sheldon Solow and Harry Macklowe continue to increase density without thought. The Sutton area used to be an area with a variety of incomes (surprisingly) due to the apts over stores in low rise buildings at one end of the spectrum and elegant townhouses on Sutton Place. We had every kind of store you could need within two blocks along with restaurants that had been in place for many, many years with a faithful customer base. Now we have glass-cube condos and Duane Reade stores one after another. This is urban blight.
No, not when every crane on
Posted by VisitorWednesday, September 26, 2007, 06:36pm
No, not when every crane on the horizon represents something I, a middle-income resident, can't possibly afford (& quality I wouldn't shell out for if I could! ). This town is the new & skewed epicenter of the "luxury market" & there is no longer any room for the middle class here.
New Miami. Unsustainably top-heavy.
The city is moving in the
Posted by Visitoraudrey leshinWednesday, September 26, 2007, 02:33pm
The city is moving in the wrong direction. This is an era of the bankification, Duane Readeification, Starbuck'sification, etc. of the city. The traffic is choking and polluting
the life out of the city. The State Assembly and Senate are engaging in petty, tin horn
politics in delaying the Mayor's Congestion Pricing Plan. They are party hacks and
only interested in their own agenda - to get elected. The public and the pedestrian
be damned. Byciclists ride through the streets unmindful of traffic lights, rules,
and direction. Especially the delivery men. No traffic policemen are around to
enforce the rules - re gridblock and other violations. New York is a city of the
lawless.! Yesterday was the time for Action - today is too late.
NO
Posted by Bing ShangWednesday, September 26, 2007, 01:59pm
NO
It's fragmented -- some
Posted by visitorWednesday, September 26, 2007, 12:16pm
It's fragmented -- some areas are, and some aren't -- and it feels like the ones that aren't are moving in a significantly negative (and unchangeable) direction . And they're getting that way quickly.
Post new comment